Through out my writings I have only touched on this subject here and there so I thought to do a summation of it with more emphases. In the time of the Scriptures there existed people that converted to the religion that was practiced by Judah and Israel. Just like today we have people that convert to deferent religions. I suspect there is a main and dominant group of people that converted to the religion practiced by Judah, and their origin is European. If we go further back in time we would find they are of the stock known as Chaldean. This is also the stock of Babylonians. So I suspect the bulk of the people known as Jews today are not of the original people of Judah but they are the Babylonians that switched sides in their religious practice. They are simply one of the families of the North.

I suspect the last three records in the Scripture becomes the History of the Babylonian converts (Jews), not the History of Judah. By this time in the Book the original people of Judah are common bondmen and women to the converts (Jews). It is the converts that became the Priest and leaders of the bonded original people of Judah. And these converts are white people or of the Caucasian race. They acquired Judah through Babylonian slave trading and purchasing. It is through this method of trade that Judah and Israel became scattered abroad upon the earth. We became nothing more but mere merchandise to all other nations to be bought traded and sold. This understanding explains this conversation.

Nehemiah 5:
1: And there was a great cry of the people and of their wives against their brethren the Jews. 2: For there were that said, We, our sons, and our daughters, are many: therefore we take up corn for them, that we may eat, and live. 3: Some also there were that said, We have mortgaged our lands, vineyards, and houses, that we might buy corn, because of the dearth. 4: There were also that said, We have borrowed money for the king's tribute, and that upon our lands and vineyards. 5: Yet now our flesh is as the flesh of our brethren, our children as their children: and, lo, we bring into bondage our sons and our daughters to be servants, and some of our daughters are brought unto bondage already: neither is it in our power to redeem them; for other men have our lands and vineyards. 6: And I was very angry when I heard their cry and these words. 7: Then I consulted with myself, and I rebuked the nobles, and the rulers, and said unto them, Ye exact usury, every one of his brother. And I set a great assembly against them. 8: And I said unto them, We after our ability have redeemed our brethren the Jews, which were sold unto the heathen; and will ye even sell your brethren? or shall they be sold unto us? Then held they their peace, and found nothing to answer. 9: Also I said, It is not good that ye do: ought ye not to walk in the fear of our God because of the reproach of the heathen our enemies? 10: I likewise, and my brethren, and my servants, might exact of them money and corn: I pray you, let us leave off this usury. 11: Restore, I pray you, to them, even this day, their lands, their vineyards, their oliveyards, and their houses, also the hundredth part of the money, and of the corn, the wine, and the oil, that ye exact of them. 12: Then said they, We will restore them, and will require nothing of them; so will we do as thou sayest. Then I called the priests, and took an oath of them, that they should do according to this promise.

Basically what we have here is bondmen or the people purchased from Babylon, complaining to their owners or masters, the Priest and nobles of Babylonian descent, of their condition in the land. An original Priest or Levite would never own bondmen and women or land. YHVH has made a decree suggesting that the people of Levi should not inherit material things such as this because HE is their inheritance, they are to only live by the tenth. So the question becomes; how do these Priests own all of this? We know Israel was not giving the tenth, basically because they were at this time a people of bondage and taxes. So how are the Priest, like Nehemiah and the rest of them well in money?

Num:18:20: And the LORD spake unto Aaron, Thou shalt have no inheritance in their land, neither shalt thou have any part among them: I am thy part and thine inheritance among the children of Israel.

Num:18:23: But the Levites shall do the service of the tabernacle of the congregation, and they shall bear their iniquity: it shall be a statute for ever throughout your generations, that among the children of Israel they have no inheritance.

Num:18:24: But the tithes of the children of Israel, which they offer as an heave offering unto the LORD, I have given to the Levites to inherit: therefore I have said unto them, Among the children of Israel they shall have no inheritance.

I remembered that the writings of Nehemiah are occurring around 100 years after the conquering of Judah by Babylon. I suspect during the 70-year enslavement, dispersal and siege of Judah by Babylon is when the converts (Jews) became extremely involved in the writings and the story line of the Bible. This is the only way we can explain a Priest owning real estate and bondmen. They had to have acquired these things through their Babylonian heritage. Due to the original people of Judah being black and the converts (Jews) being white or Caucasian, the original people of Judah went into slavery to all other nations and people. With the absence and diminished state of the original people of Judah, over the process of time, the converts (Jews) have now come to believe they are the original people of the tribe Judah.

The words spoken by YHVH were fulfilled, but we returned as bondmen and woman to the converts (Jews) and noble men of Babylon.

Jer:29:10: For thus saith the LORD, That after seventy years be accomplished at Babylon I will visit you, and perform my good word toward you, in causing you to return to this place.

The original prophecy of our captivity shows it to be 430 years. 70 of those years are done in Babylon. So even after we returned, there continued to be 360 more years to fulfill.

Ezek:4:
5: For I have laid upon thee the years of their iniquity, according to the number of the days, three hundred and ninety days: so shalt thou bear the iniquity of the house of Israel. 6: And when thou hast accomplished them, lie again on thy right side, and thou shalt bear the iniquity of the house of Judah forty days: I have appointed thee each day for a year.

It's the same old story. When you see a large expedition in a foreign land you mostly see the natives doing the work and digging. But when you go to the person or people leading the expedition, most of the time they are white men. Well, the exact same thing was occurring in the Scripture. The situation is the same; time has not changed things that much.

Some people have asked; what is my evidence that at least Judah was black people. In explaining this you have to realize that this is not something that is going to jump right out at the reader. In those days they did not truly have a concept that divided races, thus it will not be expressed in the writings of the Bible. In Nehemiah 5:5, the person speaking is a bondman of the people he is complaining to. So what is that man looking at that would make him say, "Yet now our flesh is as the flesh of our brethren, our children as their children"? I suspect he was looking at mixed people and children. This mixture came from the white Babylonian Priest and noble men taking the women of the original people of Judah as bondwoman. They were not blood brothers but brothers in faith. This same condition is occurring in Africa today. The only deference is the people taking them as bondmen and women are Muslims. I suspect the owners of Judah did not let the bondmen of Judah mate with the Babylonian woman. Nor did they let them mate with the females that were born through the combination of the Babylonian male and the bondwoman of Judah. Doing so would have caused the children to come out with a more ethnic look of the original people of Judah. And this could be why today the converts (Jews) say you are only a Jew if you can show your mother was a Jew. They have to go with this because the female is their only link to the original people of Judah. Science today follows the bloodline of the woman but the Bible seems to follow the bloodline of the man. Over the process of time the people that call themselves Jews are the people that are the descendants of this method of birth control mixed with the original seed or people of Babylonians. They are the result of the bondwoman of Judah being mated to the nobles and Priest of Babylonian descent. The point in which they missed their opportunity to become truly mixed into the bloodline that will inherit the Golden Throne, according to the Old Testaments; would be were they did not let the bondmen of Judah mate with the woman of Babylonian descent. This whole concept is in harmony with:

Dan:11:35: And some of them of understanding shall fall, to try them, and to purge, and to make them white, even to the time of the end: because it is yet for a time appointed.

I understand this as; the people that conquered Judah came upon the writings and doctrines of Judah, mainly the original Bible. They read, studied and understood what it was saying. And they realized that the people they had conquered are the people of the Living GOD. Thus they devised a plan to make the people of GOD white or of the Caucasian race. I am not saying that there are not some of those that did become part of the bloodline, as there were some sporadic relationships between the women of Babylonian descent and the bondmen of Judah. Nor am I saying all the converts participated in this method of berth control. The bulk of them continue to be of the Babylonian bloodline. Another passage that is suspicious to there being a color line between the people of Israel and several of the major nations that came against them:

Hosea:7:8: Ephraim, he hath mixed himself among the people; Ephraim is a cake not turned.

That passage is saying one of two things; Ephraim are black people that mixed themselves with white people or Ephraim was white people that mixed themselves with black people. That action creates a people when looked at, as a whole, appears to be like a cake unturned. Being dark on one side and white on the other. This would be a good indication or starting point to locate the people of Ephraim. As a whole their skin color will have an extreme in color range. Meaning they will be a people of the same origin but you could look at one and thank they was Negro. You could look at another and thank they was Caucasian. Also I suspect the people of Ephraim will be the most infested with Christianity and or Catholicism. So that would be the two qualities of the people that could be Ephraim today, extreme color range and heavily infested with Catholicism and or Christianity or some form of the worship of Jesus.

The oldest person on the earth today is a dead woman referred to as Lucy. She was found in Ethiopiah, a land whose origin can not be traced and whose original inhabitance are black people.

I was speaking with a black Evangelist and she said the reason the people were angry with Moses is because he had married an Ethiopian or black woman and Moses was white. Well, needles to say; I set it strait. I informed here that the reason they were angry with Moses is because he married out side of his own tribe. Even more he married outside of the 12 tribes of Israel and that's why Aaron and Miriam was wroth with Moses. Moses himself was a black man. I thought I would share that with you so you can see what they are teaching us. I do not mean to sound prejudice or looking to become an uprising against white people, I am far from that. But when you study the Bible it is imperative that you deal in reality. And it is a reality that black people are the original people of the earth, all of us started out black or with skin that has the natural ability to accommodate for the effects of the sun. And it is a reality that white people have conquered all of earth. And it is a reality that YHVH said HE would bring a nation upon us to spoil, conquer, enslave and straiten us. And it is a reality that it has occurred. Another passage that raises suspicion.

Hab:1:6: For, lo, I raise up the Chaldeans, that bitter and hasty nation, which shall march through the breadth of the land, to possess the dwellingplaces that are not theirs.

With the Tanakh ending with the Babylonians/Chaldeans in control or as Judah being defeated that means Hab 1:6 continues to be active today. I do not mean to say the people that call themselves Jews today are not acceptable by YHVH or they are the enemy, that's only a question that can be answered by YHVH and or their own actions. What we have to realize is YHVH has chosen this people to sustain HIS religion as best they could while Judah received our chastisement in parallel to letting the Adversary be setup on earth. If the religion had been left in the hands of the original people of Judah alone, it would have utterly been lost. So by putting the religion in the hands of another people it has been protected and sustained through time.

I have noticed in newer English Jewish Bibles that they have started replacing the saying, "Sons of GOD" with, "Divine beings or Angels of GOD". So as you can see the Jews of this generation, through editing the Books, have already started manipulate the faith of the Jews to come in the next generation. They have started editing this because the Jews have now taken the stand that they do not believe GOD had Sons. The method at which they are editing the Books today is the same meathead their great, great forefathers used to convince the Jews of today that they are the original people of the tribe Judah. Look at it like this; if the Jews of today had not been convinced that they are the people of Judah, would they have maintained a loyalty to the Script over time?

Addendum: 11-2-99
I have been debating with people on a Jewish message board. One of their reasons for believing they are the original people of the Old Testaments is a lot of them claim to be able to trace their bloodline all the way back to David the king or the tribe of Levi. Strange that they predominately profess these two tribes, out of the whole Bible these are the two dominant tribes or tribes of power.

In examining their ability to trace their bloodline one has to look at all of the things Jews have been through. Is it logical to believe a people can trace their bloodline all the way back to the Bible after they have experienced slavery, holocaust the Spanish Inquisition and the Black Plague? In reading the Bible I have come to suspect the original people of Israel and Judah would be a people today unable to trace their bloodline beyond the country that conquered and enslaved them. The way the Bible reads Israel and Judah were eventually totally displaced. Further more the Jews that claim they can trace their bloodline back as far as the Bible seem to not understand or just will not accept the fact that having this ability does not fit to the way the holocaust is recorded in History. I find it very odd and unusual that a country would pillage, murder, plunder and destroy the Jew but yet take the time to keep track of their birth records, who they are, who their parents are and keep track of all of the things that were taken from them. The Jews says this was performed in the days of Hitler.

To test their ability to trace their bloodline all the way back to a specific tribe I devised a little test. I asked anyone on the board to take fifteen characters or names from any of the last three records of the Bible, Ezra, Nehemiah and Ester and trace those characters bloodline all the way back to a tribe as in the Torah or 1 and 2 kings. In doing so it is not valid to trace it to where a character simply says they are of the tribe Judah or Levi, but the trace must go as follow: John the son of Ben the son of Mark the son of Jeff the son of Pete the son of Steve the son of…etc. Eventually this would lead the reader to a tribe. This trace should go through several of the writings of the Bible, in other words the reader should be able to confirm the names in other writings of the Bible. Each person and each writing of the Bible would be linked through the bloodline trace of characters. The reason I say it is not valid to trace the bloodline to a person that is simply confessing they are of Judah is because of this passage.

Esth:2:5: Now in Shushan the palace there was a certain Jew, whose name was Mordecai, the son of Jair, the son of Shimei, the son of Kish, a Benjamite;

As you can clearly see Mordecai is of the tribe Benjamin but he calls himself a Jew. This is proof positive that the word Jew is not a reference to the tribe Judah but would be more understood as a reference to a religion that was practiced by the people of the tribe Judah. So it is as I have been saying all along. The word Jew is not a reference to the original people of Judah. Several Jews of today strongly disagree with this point of view. In speaking with the Jews on the message board I have come to suspect a lot of them have more of a loyalty to being able to trace their bloodline then they do to the religion itself. You have to realize what they are trying to do, if they get the Messiah or the people of the earth to accept that they are legitimately tracing their bloodline then it would mean they are the people that will have absolute power in the next Kingdom to come. I suspect this prospect is what they have developed a loyalty to.

So when the Messiah does not call a particular person up to serve as Levi or represent Judah, these people who have these records and bloodline traces that have been kept by their ancestors will have to make a choice between what the Messiah is saying and their written records. I suspect several of them will become angry and disavow the very religion they have held as sacred. And by the way no one replied to the test. I personally do not know if it can be done or not. All I did is tried it with a few characters. With a small effort the only character I came close to tracing was Ezra. My point being is after the fall of Judah the ability to trace a character's bloodline falls off to an impossibility. The Jews that say they can trace their bloodline beyond the last three records of the Old Testaments are claiming to be able to do something that is beyond the Book itself. The Book was not written so that one could do this.

Addendum: 12-27-99
More evidence that there was people that did not belong to any of the tribes but yet referred to themselves as Jews and became apart of the community of Judah.

Isa22:
15: Thus saith the Lord GOD of hosts, Go, get thee unto this treasurer, even unto Shebna, which is over the house, and say, 16: What hast thou here? and whom hast thou here, that thou hast hewed thee out a sepulchre here, as he that heweth him out a sepulchre on high, and that graveth an habitation for himself in a rock? 17: Behold, the LORD will carry thee away with a mighty captivity, and will surely cover thee.

The individual YHVH is referring to would be Shebna one of the men that came out to meet the servant of Assyria. These are the entire hits on Shebna:

2Kgs:18:18: And when they had called to the king, there came out to them Eliakim the son of Hilkiah, which was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and Joah the son of Asaph the recorder.

2Kgs:18:26: Then said Eliakim the son of Hilkiah, and Shebna, and Joah, unto Rab-shakeh, Speak, I pray thee, to thy servants in the Syrian language; for we understand it: and talk not with us in the Jews' language in the ears of the people that are on the wall.

2Kgs:18:37: Then came Eliakim the son of Hilkiah, which was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and Joah the son of Asaph the recorder, to Hezekiah with their clothes rent, and told him the words of Rab-shakeh.

2Kgs:19:2: And he sent Eliakim, which was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and the elders of the priests, covered with sackcloth, to Isaiah the prophet the son of Amoz.

Isa:22:15: Thus saith the Lord GOD of hosts, Go, get thee unto this treasurer, even unto Shebna, which is over the house, and say,

Isa:36:3: Then came forth unto him Eliakim, Hilkiah's son, which was over the house, and Shebna the scribe, and Joah, Asaph's son, the recorder.

Isa:36:11: Then said Eliakim and Shebna and Joah unto Rabshakeh, Speak, I pray thee, unto thy servants in the Syrian language; for we understand it: and speak not to us in the Jews' language, in the ears of the people that are on the wall.

Isa:36:22: Then came Eliakim, the son of Hilkiah, that was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and Joah, the son of Asaph, the recorder, to Hezekiah with their clothes rent, and told him the words of Rabshakeh.

Isa:37:2: And he sent Eliakim, who was over the household, and Shebna the scribe, and the elders of the priests covered with sackcloth, unto Isaiah the prophet the son of Amoz.

The only thing I find odd in this is YHVH refers to Shebna as the treasurer, while all through the story line he is referred to as the scribe. Never the less, what we have here is YHVH making a statement to a convert Jew. Shebna was not from any of the tribes of Israel and had become a noble man among Judah, that's why YHVH said to Shebna, "what has thou here and whom has thou here". As we can see it looks as if Shebna was trying to go even further up in the ranks among Judah. It seems YHVH gave the next promotion to Eliakim.