I have know read Isa7 and 8 more in-depth, I have know seen it clearly. It has been said Immanuel is Jesus. This is also recorded in the NT, Mat1:23. The prophesy of Immanuel is record in Isa7 and 8. Isa7:14 is indeed a detailed description of how the NT depict the birth of Immanuel. It is also some details of what Immanuel did in the NT. Isa7:14 is also one of the prophesies the followers of Jesus use to show he is the messiah.
When one reads Isa7 and 8 in their entirety, it becomes clear it is not prophesy of a savior for Judah nor Israel, as a lot of Christians would have you to believe. It actually is a warning of the destroying faction that will deliver the final conquering blow to Judah and Israel.
No where in Isa7 and 8 does God say it is prophesy of a savior for Israel or Judah, as a lot of people would have you to believe. The main conversation of Isa7 is Isa7:5. The sign in Isa7:14 is a sign to Ahaz about Syria, Ephram and the son of Remaliahs evil counsel they have taken up to breach Judah and set a king in the midst of it. This is depicted in Isa7:5-6. Does not the NT try to set a king in the midst of Judah. Has it not been said he was born from a virgin.
Isa7 is prophesy of the NT or the religion of the destroying faction. Isa8:4 is prophesy of the actual time Immanuel would be an infant. Immanuel is an infant during the conquer of the Assyrian Empire, Isa8:4. In Isa 8:4 God gives us the time zone of when Jesus is an infant. So I set out to find the actual event of the prophesy. I have found the actual event has been removed or edited from the book.
The Assyrian Empire conquered ten tribes of Israel, 2Kgs17:23. From this time on only Judah is left in the land. And Judah was surrounded by people of Babylon, Cithah, Ava, Hamath and Sepharvaim, 2Kgs17:24.
The time of the fall of the Assyrian Empire has been removed or covered up. I feel it was done by Rome who is actually the Babylonian Empire. They did this to hide who their nation truly is, they are the ones that defeated all of Israel. And I feel it is indeed the Babylonian Empire that made the agreement with whom they feel is Satan, Isa28:15. If I can study the OT and get a feel for who Satan or the Fallen could be, so can they. I feel the NT is their contract.
The Assyrian Empire takes Damascus, 2Kgs16:9. The Assyrian Empire takes ten tribes of Israel which is Samaria, 2Kgs17:23. So know the stage is set for the prophesy in Isa8:4. The fall of Assyrian Empire, I personally can not find.
After the Assyrian Empire conquers ten tribes of Israel, only Judah and a percentage of Levi (blood line of Zadok) is left in the land. Judah finally gets conquered by the Babylonian Empire, 2Kgs25. The name Assyria was changed to Assur, Ezra4:2. I can find know more information on the Assyrian Empire after Esarhaddon becomes king.
There are several prophesies from God about the Assyrian Empire being defeated, so we know it happen. I feel Jesus was an infant in the time zone of Judah being defeated by Babylon, 2Kgs25. All of 2Kgs25 fits the description of Isa8:4. The Assyrian Empire just fades out of the script. There are three possible nations that would have defeated it Babylon, Persia or Rome. Or they are all the same nation.
When Babylon ruled the earth, I feel they destroyed libraries and key cities and changed their name to Rome to hide their identities. I feel their was no five hundred year gap between the OT and NT. This could not be possible because God gave you the time period when Immanuel was an infant, thus there is no gap as some people would have you to believe. Seeing Rome as Babylon is the only way one can fit the NT into the time line of the prophesy of Immanuel being an infant.
I suspect Immanuel the man was some one who studied the Scripture and ran around Rome spewing it to the conquered of Judah. And Immanuels ministry was indeed rousing Judah to the level of being rebellious against Rome. And Rome took Immanuel the man and made an example out of him by crucifying him before Judah. And Rome wrote the NT around the life of Immanuel. The NT was originally written to cause Judah to transgress against God continually. Thus their would know more be rebellious ministries like Immanuel. This would also insure the Roman Empires rein.
The King James we have today is the true Bible with a false bible woven into it by the Adversaries. Look at it like this King James would have never been King if Israel was never defeated. So they devised a method to prolong their rein. That method is the dilution of the religion of God. This is done by deceiving Israel into serving Jesus the Christ. And we know what God said about serving other gods. All of this fits into the Word of God:
Deut:4:28: And there ye shall serve gods, the work of men's hands, wood and stone, which neither see, nor hear, nor eat, nor smell.
Deut:28:36: The LORD shall bring thee, and thy king which thou shalt set over thee, unto a nation which neither thou nor thy fathers have known; and there shalt thou serve other gods, wood and stone.
NOTE: This one is in conflict with this theory because Israel did know Babylon, but they did not know them as Rome and their offspring America.
Deut:28:64: And the LORD shall scatter thee among all people, from the one end of the earth even unto the other; and there thou shalt serve other gods, which neither thou nor thy fathers have known, even wood and stone.
Deut:29:17: And ye have seen their abominations, and their idols, wood and stone, silver and gold, which were among them:)
Is not the crucifix a wood cross with a stone figuring hanging on it?