Divinely
Signature of God Theory "Examined"
Perceived through a study of the Word of God
June 20 1998

I was wrong. In my second reading of Jeremiah, I have found where God Himself suggest false prophets that prophesies in His name do exist. This can be found in Jer28, Jer29:9. But the one thing we lack is the writings of Hananiah the prophet. If we had those writings, I feel we would see that the source of Hananiah’s prophesy never expressed or said it was God. I feel we would see the source was a son of God or an angel. I am correct when I say, looking for this signiture does indeed focus your study of the Word of God. The Scripture is an overwhelming amount of text, theories and philosophies. You must come to a means of focusing.

The way Hananiah’s prophesy is presented to us in the Book is Hananiah has already interpreted his vision. So without the writings of Hananiah’s vision that lead him to spewing false prophesy, we can not know if it was indeed God that spoke the words to him.

But yet it has been verified by God Himself that there are false prophets that speaks in His name. I feel they speak in His name through their own misinterpretation of who the entity was that spoke with them. They assume the entity comes in a good light. You must understand, Satan also has a kingdom; it must exist in order for our loyalty to God be tested. The relationship of God and Satan or the Adversary that western religions have developed are false. If you instinctively put God in the center of all doing, you would understand this. In the Adversaries kingdom the final orders and approval of deceit is approved by God. Notice Jer25:9 how God calls the King of Babylon His servant. Is it possible this is what Jesus meant when he said resist not evil, Mat5:39?

It is also a valid point of view to see God and the Adversary as independent of one another. But I fore one can not bring myself to believe there is a kingdom opposite but equal to God unless it has been permitted.