I have presented to you a lot of information; some could even say an overwhelming amount. As I stated in my earlier writings I tried to avoid this but the Word of GOD became something of an infatuation to me. When I first opened the Torah, I was a servant of Jesus. As I read and studied the very Books Jesus is suppose to be founded on I became less and less a servant of Jesus. I have even come to suspect that Jesus and his servants is the fourth beast depicted in Daniel 7. How does a man who attended Catholic and Baptist schools in his younger days and also came up in a family of ministers and priest read a Book and becomes a non-believer in what he has been taught most all his life? The only way something like this could occur is there must be a deference in what people teach and what the actual Books themselves teach. I am not one to follow something just because my mother, brother, sister, grandmother, grandfather etc…. follows it. If I am presented with evidence that I am doing something wrong, is it wrong of me to explore and examine that evidence? And basically in my mind that is what occurred with me. I was given evidence through the Specific sayings of GOD that my current religious beliefs were incorrect. Through my study and examination of the Word of GOD and the Books, I have concluded that Jesus or the New Testaments is a false doctrine created through plagiarizing specific parts and sayings from the Old Testaments. It is highly likely that our LORD GOD proveth us with the New Testaments. There are several things I have addressed and several things I have not. I have seen many discrepancies in the Old Testaments as well, for example, Ezra 5:1 and Zechariah 1:1. In Ezra Zechariah is the son of Iddo but in Zechariah, Zechariah is the son of Berechiah then Iddo is Berechiah's father which would make Iddo the grandfather of Zechariah. These types of discrepancies I can not explain. I did notice in Ezra 5:4, "Then said we", suggests that the narrators of Ezra could be the very people that was against Jerusalem being rebuilt. The narrative seems to jump back and forth between first, second and third person point of view. So it is possible the discrepancies are there to make an in-depth study just throw his hands up and say all of this is falsehood created through a poorly written story. Then one becomes what we call Atheist or agnostic. You should have the ability to recognize that GOD Himself did not write those passages, thus they are the writings of men. So the discrepancies in who Zechariah's father is, is not something that should have an impact on your faith in GOD and the way you serve HIM.

As you have seen through my writings that in the beginning of them I was indeed referring to Jesus as Christ. But I was at that time writing from the point of view as to what I had been taught. As my writings and understanding has grown, I no longer use the conjunction of Jesus and the word Christ. I have come to believe they are two separate beings. Several people try to say that I do not believe in the Christ because I do not believe in Jesus. So I would like to make it very clear, I believe in Christ/Messiah what I do not believe is Jesus was he. The best defense that I have seen against recruiters of other religions is to ask them to show you where GOD Himself has spoken what they minister or preach. Ask them to show you where a Specific saying of GOD supports their entire philosophy as they present it. A lot of them try to say the whole Book is the Word of GOD, then you tell them to show you were GOD Himself said that. If they can not accomplish the task then their whole way of faith is based on the words and doctrines of men and if those doctrines are not according to the Specific sayings of GOD, then there is no light in them.

If you are going to be a servant of Jesus then Catholicism would be the beast and most loyal method of doing so. Catholicism is the oldest and purist method of serving Jesus. All other religions that have sprung from the New Testaments are a fundamental derivative of Catholicism. Due to the fact that Jesus only spoke about 7% of the words in the New Testaments, all of the theories and philosophies that have come from the servants of Jesus must be based on the writings of men (apostles). Bottom line is Jesus himself did not say enough for one to conclude what has been concluded, Jesus himself did not give enough information. And that's why Catholicism has the highest incidents of graven images. Catholicism understands the only way one can ensure Jesus is to account all of the major characters in the New Testaments as Holy or equivalent to the Specific sayings of GOD and that act alone becomes an abomination. The entire concept of Jesus as it exists today is based solely on the understanding of men. Meaning it is not based on the specific sayings of GOD. I have even shown you were the KJV Old Testaments have been altered or mistranslated to make it fit more to the New Testaments. I have even come to suspect when they wrote the KJV Old Testaments that they did indeed have an English translated Bible. In my examination of Hebrew I have found words like "he, and, that, we, they, the, will, etc…" to be more of an additive or a guess to where they belong in the Hebrew Script syntactic structure. As the so-called original Hebrew Script is written it can be more described as flashes of words, as for syntax structure it is based mostly on imagination. And as I have said you can just about read the Tanakh and the KJV word for word. The odds of two different groups of people translating that amount of Hebrew Script to English and coming up with their translations being that close together are very slim. So I am suggesting that the English KJV was not translated from Greek which is said to be translated from the Hebrew Script. The evidence shows that the KJV existed in English first. It suggest that it had to have been translated some time after rules and guide lines were established for translating from Hebrew to English or it suggest that it was altered strait from an English Bible then given the name King James Version. And they created the Gregorian Bible to use as an excuse when one would see the discrepancies between the Bibles that were translated from Hebrew to English and the KJV that is said to be translated from Hebrew to Greek to English. Bottom line is the Books have too much word to word translations for the KJV to have been translated to English from Greek from Hebrew.

Well; as I have said, my writings put forth a lot of thought and questions. Through all of it you continue to have a basic choice. But remember one thing, it is GOD Himself that gives you the choice between life and death. I hope you choose life, for it is not the will of YHVH to destroy but to bring you into righteousness. You can be close to YHVH and understand HIS will without being perfect your self. Was Moses, David and Solomon perfect? People lie to you when they say you have to be perfect in order to understand the will of YHVH and when they say the Messiah will be perfect or sinless. What they are truly doing is deterring you from attempting it.

Deu 30: 19: I call heaven and earth to record this day against you, that I have set before you life and death, blessing and cursing: therefore choose life, that both thou and thy seed may live: 20: That thou mayest love the LORD thy God, and that thou mayest obey his voice, and that thou mayest cleave unto him: for he is thy life, and the length of thy days: that thou mayest dwell in the land which the LORD sware unto thy fathers, to Abraham, to Isaac, and to Jacob, to give them.

All I can do is present the evidence. I will always study the Word of GOD, but I feel I have given you enough information to do the right thing. If the LORD giveth me the means, I would spend the rest of my life trying to confirm some of the things I have seen. One must ask, why has these Books been written in this way, in which one man can write a doctrine and destroy all other religions by observing the Specific sayings of YHVH? One must ask, why did they stick the name Emmanuel in the New Testaments instead of the name Zerubbabel? When one reads all of the prophecy about Emmanuel it becomes very clear he is not good prophecy for Israel and Judah. The writers of the New Testaments had to have seen this. The writers of the New Testaments appear to be highly intelligent. So one must ask, out of all the names in the Old Testaments why did they select that particular one? The one name that is associated with the final fall of Judah. Did not GOD out right choose Zerubbabel, Hag 2:23? So if one was going to create a false Messiah wouldn't Zerubbabel be the beast name to pick out of the Old Testaments? So why didn't the writers of the New Testaments do that?

What I am trying to tell you is the New Testaments have been cleverly and decisively written so that the validity of it could be challenged. The people or entity that created the New Testaments created it in a manner so that it could be refuted, it was intended. This is for those people that thank I will go to Hell for speaking out or challenging the story of Jesus, Mat 12:32. Now do you see what I mean about how the New Testaments have been written. This was meant to be. It was created for us to figure out not for us to fear and serve. Only the LORD GOD of Israel shall ye account as HOLY, let HIM be your fear, let HIM be your Rock.

In the name of YHVH, the Mighty one of Jacob, the Holy one of Israel, great is HIS whole Works.

Zechariah 1: 18: Then lifted I up mine eyes, and saw, and behold four horns. 19: And I said unto the angel that talked with me, What be these? And he answered me, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, Israel, and Jerusalem. 20: And the LORD shewed me four carpenters. 21: Then said I, What come these to do? And he spake, saying, These are the horns which have scattered Judah, so that no man did lift up his head: but these are come to fray them, to cast out the horns of the Gentiles, which lifted up their horn over the land of Judah to scatter it.