Dr. Bob's
Critical Thinking Site
|
Warrant Page The Warrant is what connects the evidence with the claim. It is the reason given for accepting the evidence as support for the stated claim. Steven Toulmin called the warrant "a bridge that entitles one to draw a conclusion." To put it another way, the warrant represents the reasoning process the arguer uses. Warrants are sometimes directly stated in the argument, but often they are assumed. Consider the following argument:
John's unstated warrant is that his one-time experience with Ford automobiles is sufficient to draw a conclusion about future experiences with Fords. Even if John's claim is clear and his evidence true, his argument fails because the warrant is faulty. John's one-time experience is not sufficient to draw the conclusion he has made. If arguers think listeners will not grasp the warrant or will not agree with it, they must state it clearly and, if necessary, provide some backing for the warrant. Consider the following argument:
Click here to learn more about thinking critically about warrants. |