Northern Kentucky's Evening Interdenominational Text of Presentation, Lesson 15, Gen 25:12-27:40 Click Here for Lesson 15 Photos |
Genesis 25:12-27:40
Jacob and Esau: A Family Feud
Last week’s lesson focused on the marriage of Isaac and the
death of Abraham. This week’s lesson follows that up with stories of Abraham’s
children, Isaac and Ishmael.
First is Ishmael, the elder. He settled in the Desert of Paran (21:21), and his
offspring settled to the west in the Wilderness of Shur, near the border of
Egypt (25:18). Notice two things in particular about Ishmael’s genealogy:
Ishmael has 12 sons and 12 tribes, just as there are 12 sons and 12 tribes of Isaac’s son Jacob later in Genesis. When Mohammed wrote the Qur’an, he co-opted for Ishmael some of the events the bible ascribes to Isaac, and the fact that Ishmael has the same number of sons as Jacob provides another possible element of confusion.
The bible says Ishmael’s offspring “lived in hostility towards all their brothers” (25:18), just as the Angel of the Lord had prophesied to his mother Hagar before his birth (16:12).
In contrast to Ishmael’s fertile Egyptian wife (21:21), Isaac’s
wife Rebekah is unable to conceive in almost 20 years of marriage – just as
happened with Sarah, her great aunt and mother-in-law. The bible does not record
Abraham prayed to God about Sarah’s infertility; instead he and Sarah took
matters into their own hands with a slave girl – and the results were
disastrous. But Isaac goes to God in prayer . . . and God “answered his prayer,
and his wife Rebekah became pregnant” with twins (25:21). Isaac may have learned
something from his father – which seems to be one of the points of tonight’s
lesson!
Rebekah’s pregnancy is not a pleasant one; she has unusually active babies! She,
too, prays to God, and is told: “Two nations are in your womb, and two peoples
from within you will be separated; one people will be stronger than the other,
and the older will serve the younger” (25:23). God is telling her the younger
son will receive the rights and privileges normally received by the firstborn –
as happened with Isaac and Ishmael. And when the twins are born, Jacob the
younger is grasping the heel of his older brother Esau (25:26) – implying Jacob
is trying to best his brother even as a newborn, and introducing a 3rd story in
Genesis of brothers in competition.
The bible fast forwards to a time when the two boys are grown (25:27). They
could hardly be more different: Esau the coarse hunter . . . Jacob engaged in
more sedentary pursuits. Parental favoritism creates or enhances a rivalry
between them: Isaac prefers Esau the manly man; Rebekah favors the quiet Jacob.
Jacob covets Esau’s birthright: the firstborn’s right to a double portion of his
father’s estate and other privileges. He sees an opportunity when Esau comes
home famished, and Jacob is cooking red lentil stew. Esau asks for some stew –
in the Hebrew he asks to “gulp it down – but Jacob makes him swear to exchange
his birthright for the stew. This is a culturally legitimate request;
extra-biblical documents record the exchange of a birthright for something else.
In any case, Esau agrees; and he sits down to eat and drink.
The bible does not condemn Jacob for his behavior; it’s reprehensible, but
direct. However, the bible criticizes Esau because he “despised his birthright”
(25:34). What does this mean? Perhaps Esau just can’t see beyond immediate
desires – like many rich kids . . . what use is a future inheritance when he’s
hungry?! Perhaps he rejects the ways of God and his parents . . . which seems to
be his attitude when he later chooses a wife. Perhaps he feels self-sufficient
and doesn’t think he’ll need his father’s inheritance – which, after all, does
not include any land.
Moving into chapter 26, the bible puts the struggle between Esau and Jacob on
hold, and returns to the story of Isaac. A famine occurs in the Negev – just as
happened with Abraham. Then Abraham moved to Egypt without consulting God (Gen
12) . . . but this time God appears as a theophany to Isaac, and instructs him
not to go to Egypt, but to stay in the land promised his father. If Isaac does
that, God promises:
“I will be with you and will bless you. For to you and your descendants I will give all these lands and will confirm the oath I swore to your father Abraham. I will make your descendants as numerous as the stars in the sky, . . . and through your offspring all nations on earth will be blessed, because Abraham obeyed me” (26:3-5 NIV)
Abraham is almost surely dead at this time, and God is proposing
to transfer His covenant with Abraham to Isaac – if Isaac is obedient, as his
father had been.
Isaac obeys, and to escape the famine, he moves from Beer Lahai Roi to Gerar in
the land of the Philistines – the same place Abraham lived earlier (Gen 20).
Here Isaac encounters a king called Abimelech – perhaps the same Abimelech
encountered by Abraham, but more likely a different king with the same name or
title, because the episode occurs at least 75 years later. In any case, Isaac
perpetrates the same ruse his father did – claiming Rebekah is his sister. This
doesn’t have the same potentially disastrous consequences Abraham’s deceit did,
because Rebekah is not taken into Abimelech’s harem. However, Isaac is sternly
upended by the king when the lie is discovered. It was discussed before that
killing a man to take his wife was not a crime in this society – but adultery
was – so Abimelech is concerned it “would have brought guilt upon” them if one
of the Philistines had slept with Rebekah (26:10). The king decrees death to
“anyone who molests” Isaac or Rebekah (26:11); perhaps he is afraid because he
has become aware Isaac is the son of Abraham – on behalf of whom God threatened
horrible consequences to the king some 75 years ago if he touched Abraham’s
wife.
Isaac tries his hand at agriculture . . . and produces “a hundredfold, because
the LORD blessed him . . . He had so many flocks and herds and servants that the
Philistines envied him” (26:12, 14). Remember: Gerar is not that far away from
the Negev, and the famine must also affect that area . . . so Isaac’s great
prosperity due to God’s blessing must lead later readers to conclude this is
what would have happened to Abraham if he had trusted God and not fled to Egypt
(Gen 12). In any case, Isaac is so prosperous the Philistines are frightened;
they ask him to move away because he has “become too powerful” (26:16).
When Isaac moves, he reopens his father’s wells. This leads to a dispute over
water rights with the local Philistine herdsmen, so Isaac moves again to avoid
such problems . . . to Beersheba. Here God again appears to Isaac as a theophany
to confirm the promises in His first appearance. Because Isaac did not leave
Canaan when the famine came, God has blessed him with prosperity in the midst of
his enemies, and God now “confirms the oath (He) swore to . . . Abraham” (26:3).
God reveals Himself as the God of his father, and promises His divine presence:
“Do not be afraid, for I am with you; I will bless you and will increase the
number of your descendants for the sake of my servant Abraham” (26:24). God’s
covenant with Abraham is formally transmitted to Isaac . . . with a promise that
despite having only 2 sons (in contrast to Ishamel’s 12), God will bless Isaac
with many descendants – just as he has already been blessed with material
wealth. And Isaac responds as his father had: he builds an altar to God.
As if to affirm God’s promise, Abimelech – along with his chief adviser and
military commander – visits Isaac in Beersheba. The king wants a treaty because
Isaac is “blessed by YHWH” (26:29). So they hold a feast and swear an oath to
one another, guaranteeing peace for Isaac (26:31).
The story of Isaac in Gerar is so much like Abraham’s that many scholars doubt
its authenticity. But the bible says it’s a different story (26:1) . . . and
there are fundamental differences, which seem to show progress learning to
follow God’s ways. As said before . . . maybe that’s the point.
Chapter 26 closes with two verses which seem to give insight into the character
of Isaac’s older son Esau. As we discussed last week, when Abraham sought a wife
for Isaac, he explicitly did not want anyone not “from the daughters of the
Canaanites, among whom I am living” (24:3). Such a woman – influenced by her
parents – would tempt Isaac’s family to assimilate into the Canaanite culture.
But Esau takes two Canaanite wives – and this was “a source of grief to Isaac
and Rebekah” (26:35). Esau is 40; Isaac is 100. Is Esau rebellious: deliberately
doing something he knows will offend his parents? . . . is he just self-centered
and hedonistic? Whatever the reason, Esau doesn’t seem to understand his
family’s special relationship to the One True God; he would be a poor choice as
heir to God’s promises to Abraham and Isaac.
Chapter 27 opens at least 35 years later; Isaac is almost 140 and nearly blind.
He must realize Esau with his Canaanite wives cannot be the heir to God’s
promises to Abraham; he surely knows about God’s revelation to Rebekah that “the
older (son) will serve the younger” (25:23), and he knows Esau sold his
birthright to Jacob some 50 years earlier. But Isaac likes Esau . . . and maybe
he wonders if a schemer like Jacob is fit to be heir to God’s promises, either.
In any case, he calls in Esau to be blessed. If the story had turned out
differently, we might have a better idea the exact significance of the father’s
blessing . . . but some scholars suggest the blessing formally confers the
rights of primogeniture – including becoming head of household on his father’s
death; it is essentially the father's Last Will and Testament. Isaac may not
feel he is free to ignore the birthright agreement between Esau and Jacob – but
he can give a blessing which circumvents much of its impact. Jacob feels he must
receive the blessing!
Rebekah has a different view than her husband; she wants her favorite Jacob to
receive the blessing. She overhears Isaac’s directions to Esau, and realizes
since he must hunt wild game and prepare a meal before he receives the blessing,
there is an opportunity to take advantage of Isaac’s poor eyesight and make a
switch. She calls in Jacob, relates what Isaac has told Esau, and tells Jacob to
bring her two choice goats – which she cooks just the way her husband likes. She
dresses Jacob in Esau’s clothes; baths were rare – as was laundry – so the
clothes smell like Esau! But there’s still a problem: Esau is hairy; Jacob is
not. Jacob fears – probably rightly – he’ll be cursed by Isaac if this deception
is discovered. (Although some commentators applaud Jacob’s reluctance to
participate . . . he seems less troubled about being dishonest than worried
about being caught.) In any case, Rebekah volunteers to take any curse . . . and
covers the back of Jacob’s hands and neck with goatskins to make him appear
hairy. Then she sends him in to receive his father’s blessing.
Jacob’s acquisition of Esau’s birthright was reprehensible but not dishonest . .
. but here he compounds lies and deceitfulness in a masquerade to steal his
father’s blessing. Isaac senses something is wrong when Jacob enters and
addresses him. He smells the food and expects Esau . . . but the voice sounds
like Jacob. It must have been obvious to Rebekah and Jacob this would be a
problem, but there’s no indication they tried to do anything about it. “Who is
it?” Isaac asks (27:18). Jacob tells his first lies: “I am Esau your firstborn,”
he says; he claims the goat Rebekah has prepared is “game” (27:19). Jacob asks
for the blessing, and makes reference to his father’s instructions – which only
Esau should know. But Isaac is still suspicious: “How did you find it so
quickly, my son?” Jacob adds blasphemy to his lies by implicating God in this
scheme: “The LORD your God gave me success” (27:20). But Isaac still isn’t
satisfied; he asks Jacob to come closer, so he can see if he feels like Esau . .
. and Rebekah’s goat skins do the trick: “The voice is the voice of Jacob, but
the hands are the hands of Esau,” Isaac says (27:22). He is about to bless Jacob
. . . but hesitates: “Are you really my son Esau?” Jacob lies again “I am”
(27:24). Isaac asks for the food. He apparently continues to think things over
as he eats the goat and drinks some wine, because after the meal he says “Come
here, my son, and kiss me” (27:26). Isaac wants to smell his son; when he does
that, he is finally satisfied it’s Esau: “Ah, the smell of my son is like the
smell of a field that the LORD has blessed” (27:27). Then he proceeds with the
blessing. Thinking it is being given to Esau, Isaac appears to acknowledge his
sons’ birthright agreement, and does not offer a double portion of his estate .
. . but Isaac is a nomad – not a landowner – and so offers something more
significant: he asks God to bless him by making the area he lives the most
productive in Canaan. Isaac designates him head of household and heir to God’s
promises to Abraham with the words “Be lord over your brothers. . . . May those
who curse you be cursed and those who bless you be blessed” (27:29).
Jacob departs without comment; he has stolen Esau’s blessing, just as he came to
do. And none too soon . . . because while Isaac delayed to convince himself the
man before him was Esau, Esau was able to kill and prepare the game Isaac
requested. So Esau comes in with food and asks for his father’s blessing when
Jacob had “hardly gone out” (27:30-31). Isaac is confused “Who are you?”
(27:32). Esau tells him. “Isaac trembled violently and said, ‘Who was it, then,
that hunted game and brought it to me? I ate it just before you came and I
blessed him’” (27:33). Even though the blessing was taken “deceitfully” (27:35),
it stands because it was given “in the presence of the LORD” (27:7); Isaac may
think he will oppose God if he tries to rescind it. Esau pleads with his father;
he acknowledges his birthright is gone, but he wants the blessing: “Bless me—me
too, my father!” he says. “(Jacob) took my birthright, and now he’s taken my
blessing! . . . Haven’t you reserved any blessing for me?” (27:34, 36). Isaac is
adamant. But Esau – the manly man – weeps aloud (27:38), and Isaac relents.
There’s not much left to give Esau –Jacob’s blessing included all the “good
stuff” – but Isaac says: “You . . . will serve your brother. But when you grow
restless, you will throw his yoke from off your neck” (27:40).
At this point, most people feel sorry for Esau – cheated by Jacob out of all
rights of primogeniture, and receiving only this puny “blessing.” Yet we must
put all this into context. God told Rebekah during her pregnancy the elder son
would serve the younger; and it’s obvious from Esau’s choice of wives he is not
a fit heir to God’s promises to Abraham. Therefore, what seems in this story
like a series of accidents, failures, and deceptions is – in the long run – just
God’s plan being put into effect through human imperfections. Another example of
this occurs later in Genesis with Jacob’s son Joseph . . . and Joseph will
articulate it so well: that often what man intends for evil, God intends for
good! And as far as payback to Jacob for his deceptive ways . . . it will become
clear next week that he is paid in kind and in full. Just because he transmits
God’s promise to Abraham by siring the line of Jesus the Messiah, Jacob is not
exempted from punishment for what he does wrong.
And as far as Isaac’s blessing is concerned . . . it becomes clear later that
Esau doesn’t suffer by having Jacob “head of the household”; he does his own
thing anyway. Nevertheless, Esau’s descendants come under the dominion of the
descendants of Jacob during the monarchy of David – but they revolt against
Solomon, and eventually gain independence. In fact, King Herod of Jesus’ time
was a descendant of Esau.