September 20,
2002
GILES FILES
By
Duncan Giles
President
NTEU Chapter 49
On this and that….Congratulations to steward Sylvia Sanders for being named
an SB/SE group manager in Carmel. I think she’ll do a fine job.
It’s just nice to finally see some permanent managers named for SB/SE Compliance.
Had an opportunity to sit in on 2 recent 3rd step grievances for LMSB (presented
very ably by Brian Kosteck and Bill Stevens, I might add). Mary Tarpley
was the hearing official and I must say I was impressed by her understanding
of the issues raised. It was refreshing to see that kind of awareness
about how things work (or don’t work) at her level.
On the national awards agreement payoff being delayed...this shouldn’t be
a surprise. Anyone who’s heard my spiel on that in the last year would
know that I’m very impressed they’ll have it ready by the end of this month.
It’s also a good thing they caught the glitch early or it could have resulted
in who knows how many thousands of grievances across the country.
In W&I Field Assistance...even though they didn’t want to, it looks
like they’ll need some SB/SE support this year. I can’t blame W&I
Field Assistance for this one since for the last 3 years they have been promised
a certain amount of hiring and then the staffing is drastically cut.
That brings W&I Field Assistance back to asking for other divisions for
help. Discussions are beginning nationally on how this will be done
in the upcoming filing season. We shall see.
I was in D.C during Labor Day week for negotiations concerning the Call
Site conversion from SB/SE to W&I. It is always an eye opener to
see what the National Office perceives is going on versus at the Call Sites.
The main issue that is still being discussed is training. The sides
differ on how much is enough if you were trained way back when on something
and haven’t used it for years. Do you need a refresher or do you need
to start from scratch? I suspect the answer is somewhere in the middle.
Also at the Call Site, there appears to be a little confusion on the latest
survey we’ve dropped there. The problem with the air out there was due
to the high levels of carbon dioxide. Any dust or mold that was found
was negligible and very comparable to what you would normally find.
We included it in the survey since a few people who have taken copies to their
physicians mentioned it in their comments. However, as far as we can
tell, dust and mold haven’t been a problem at our Call Site.
That’s it for now.
===============================================================
AWARDS PAYMENTS:
DELAYED
As Duncan mentioned above, the payments for the new national awards program
have been delayed. As we go to press, the word we have is that those
on the direct deposit system will have the payments September 30, others should
see the checks October 2nd. The delay resulted from a test run that
revealed a number of glitches. Rather than have numerous incorrect payouts,
the decision was made to wait and get it right.
Many Chapter 49 members have expressed concern about the national awards
agreement and have said the local agreement Chapter 49 negotiated many years
ago was a far superior system compared to the one we have now. We at
Chapter 49 have no argument with that. We liked the old local contract
on awards. The reason there is a national and not a local agreement
stems from the management’s hard line in the most recent bargaining over awards.
In order to preserve some kind of fair and equitable system, the national
awards program was negotiated. There is much that is good about the
new national agreement. And NTEU continues to push management to award
more Quality Step Increases (QSIs). Let’s give the new national awards
program a chance. It may not be better than the old local contract,
but it’s what we have now.
=======================================================================
VOLUNTEER TIME:
NATIONAL GRIEVANCE
Article 36, Section 11, of the National Agreement provides an exciting new
provision. It allows employees to receive up to 8 hours of administrative
time per year to volunteer time for a “legitimate public service organization.”
The IRS must approve the organizations eligible for this, but at the time
the provision was being negotiated, that didn’t seem to be a major problem.
A September 4th, 2002 Memo issued by management takes the position that the
only “public service organization” activities allowed under this contract
provision will be the IRS-sponsored volunteer programs, such as VITA
and TCE. NTEU believes this narrow interpretation of the contract provision
is improper, and a national grievance has been filed to challenge the management’s
interpretation. Anyone with specific examples of leave being denied
under this contract provision should e-mail Dean Crawford at Dean.Crawford@irs.gov.
==========================================================
TAX LAW CONTRACTING:
AN UPDATE
You have been reading and hearing about a “pre-feasibility” study the IRS
is conducting on the possibility of contracting out to the private sector
some of the telephone tax law work done at Accounts Management Call Sites
such as the one here in Indianapolis. There have been some developments
on this issue, so as part of Chapter 49’s ongoing effort to keep you as informed
and up-to-date as possible, here is the latest information.
IRS management is in the final stages of a “pre-feasibility” study phase.
This phase looks at whether there is any reason to move forward with a full-blown
feasibility study on this contracting proposal. NTEU has no ability
to become involved in the process at the pre-feasibility or feasibility study,
but IRS management has agreed to brief national union officials on the status
of the process. Commissioner Rossotti will receive the results of the
pre-feasibility study in late September, and then the decision will be made
to either stop the process there or move forward with a full-blown feasibility
study that would take about six months to complete.
The most recent briefing indicates that IRS is now looking to expand the
scope of the contracting proposal. But note that the expansion would
only include e-mailed tax questions sent to Web sites, R-Mail referrals now
staffed by Compliance employees and forms distribution center Call Site work.
The expansion of scope does not directly impact anyone working at the Indianapolis
Call Site.
This process has a long way to go, even if it is not stopped along the way
because it does not appear feasible. In a worst case scenario it would
take years for tax law work to actually be contracted to the private sector.
We at Chapter 49 continue to believe that our own people can do this work
better and cheaper than any possible private contractor. But since this
process is moving forward, we just want you to know where it stands, and
we will continue to keep you posted on any developments.
================================================================
NTEU APPRECIATES IRS
SECRETARIES
NTEU has been saying for some time now that IRS secretaries, especially
those at the GS-5 level, are in need of an upgrade. When GS-6 secretarial
positions outside the bargaining unit were upgraded to GS-7 as part of the
IRS reorganization, NTEU continued to ask why the GS-5s in the bargaining
unit were not also being upgraded. The Service agreed to form a committee
with NTEU. At first, all seemed well. Then the classifiers just said
no to the upgrade, wouldn't explain why and wouldn't give any indication what
duties needed to be added to the GS-5 to qualify for an upgrade to GS-5 on
the pay schedule.
NTEU National President Colleen Kelley recently met with Deputy Commissioner
Bob Wenzel in an attempt to get this process back on track. Wenzel said
an upgrade of secretaries from GS-5 to GS-6 would cost the Service about $10
million IRS cannot afford. NTEU cannot verify this figure and has no
idea how it was computed. Colleen described the meeting with Wenzel
as one where neither he nor she changed their minds.
President Kelley says there are three things she plans to do in an effort
to push for the secretarial upgrade. First, the national union will
ask the Service to compare the GS-5 secretary population to the GS-6/7 non-unit
population to see if there are any disparities that might violate the law.
Secondly, a petition will be circulated that each grade 5 secretary will be
encouraged to sign, so Colleen can present it to the new commissioner.
Lastly, Colleen will encourage NTEU members to write down their thoughts about
why they think this decision is wrong, e.g., how they do more complex work
than they are given credit for, how they serve two or more work groups, how
technical and professional employees have to be pulled away from their duties
to help out with secretarial work because there
is too much to do, etc.
NTEU plans to fight for the secretaries, the backbone of the IRS.
Colleen said it best - "While I cannot promise any secretary that we are
going to win this fight, I can promise that we will not leave one stone unturned
in our effort to correct this injustice."